![]() ![]() “I totally prefer the new way,” Chris Wurst agreed. Naturally, this took a lot more time and was a lot more frustrating.” Since I didn’t even know where to begin on some of these, I found myself putting in a lot more iffy guesses just to get something down and see if it would open something up. But also, it’s considerably less fun when you are scrambling to even find a foothold to begin solving…usually, I don’t fill something in and toy with it in my mind unless I’m reasonably sure it’s right. “I vainly prefer the modern puzzles,” wrote Ria Ali, “if only because I’m better at solving them. ![]() On that, to my mild surprise, our opinions were also mostly in accord. The question that follows is whether the Great Easing is a good thing. ![]() Growing means expanding the profitable base with easier, more modern puzzles, even at the risk of alienating hard-line traditional solvers who have memorized every 4 letter river in the world.” “It’s the bane of all public companies,” he wrote, “the need for growth. Why? Hard to say, but I suspect Steve Melnick, one of the solvers in the table above, pinpointed the likeliest scenario for what he called “The Great Easing.” The numbers showed what they showed, and our collective anecdotal experience was unanimous: Things have gotten much easier. That said, solving a crossword is more about recognizing letter patterns and general knowledge, and the few pop culture clues sprinkled throughout-though easier in 2021-aren’t numerous enough to make a huge difference, and are certainly not enough to explain the massive time disparity between eras.) ![]() (There’s one caveat here, which is that topical references will obviously be much easier in the 2021 puzzles, since, well, we live in the year 2021. In that way, I’m almost a perfect test case, because my level is such that I’ll almost never fail to solve a modern puzzle, but take me back 10 years, and some will stump me. If I had stuck it out for the final sections, I believe I would have completed the puzzle eventually, but the time would be even worse. To answer my own question from the first paragraph, those puzzles I found so difficult in my 20s are still just as difficult today. The lower our skill level, the more pronounced the difference, and in fact my times are the least reliable of all, because on several of the older puzzles, I gave up after 45 minutes (even that felt like a lot of wasted time) and assessed myself a penalty. I’ll spare you the more granular breakdown, but it was the same if you looked at any individual day. The headline here is that for every single one of us, 2021 was the easiest slate. Here’s a breakdown of how our times looked by era (asterisks indicate that the solver finished all puzzles): Some of my friends completed every puzzle, while some (like me) completed only a portion. That’s nine puzzles from each era, and 36 overall, which feels like a decent sample size. To test my hypothesis, I asked them to complete the following act of unpaid labor with me (unpaid for them, that is):įinish three weeks of Thursday-Saturday puzzles from 2021, three weeks from 2015, three weeks from 2005, and three weeks from 1995. Some are on roughly equal footing with me, and most are much better-the kind of geniuses who routinely solve Friday and Saturday puzzles in under 10 minutes. Today, it’s extremely rare that a puzzle will stymie me for longer than 20 minutes, Saturday or otherwise, and when it does it’s usually because I’m tired or buzzed or both.įinally, a few weeks ago, I decided to run a live experiment, and for help I enlisted some friends with whom I spend 10-15 minutes each day talking and complaining about Will Shortz’s puzzles on a Slack chat room. Back then, a tough Saturday puzzle could take up to an hour. The first time it happened, it was a very big deal for me, nerdy as that sounds. Why would I be faster at crosswords?Īnd yet, a decade ago it would have been a real achievement to complete the three hardest days of the puzzle, Friday through Sunday, with no errors. I mean, I have to sit and ponder things now, like an old man on a porch swing. How could I be performing at a higher level today than 10 years ago, when I was a sharp 20-something whose synapses fired like lightning? Yes, it’s technically possible I am getting better at crosswords in general-this conclusion would appeal to my ego-but the futility of the wilting brain in all other walks of life made it seem doubtful. I’ve had a suspicion for a few years now that the New York Times crossword puzzle has become far easier, but the only evidence was that my solving times had improved measurably despite the fact that my late-30s brain now moves at the speed of sludge. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |